#askU2 Question #10, #11

#askU2 -Were @U2 to get @ClintonFdn $$$ for @RED for [trying to] throw the millennial vote #election2016?

-Good Question. This was Bono five days before appearing on iHeartradio livestream broadcast to sing "Desire" tooled to reject Trump (complete with the lyric, "she's the promise, in the year of election"). Not to mention they tried twice, as well as saying so on Charlie Rose (the exact same day he made an appearance at the Clinton Global Initiative). 

#askU2 -Did @U2 "Hug a Millennial" #election2016 = @ClintonFdn @ClintonGlobal $$$ for @RED = win-win avoiding the IRS?

Ah, Good Question. See, I ran into this quote: 

"Even if no improper favors beyond access to top State Department officials is ever shown, the WikiLeaks e-mails reveal a disturbing pattern of international solicitation fraud on the part of the Clinton Foundation. Formed as a vehicle to build a presidential library for Bill Clinton, the Foundation began work in Haiti and other countries in 2003. But it didn’t have clearance from New York authorities to operate internationally, which may explain why no official audit of its activities was conducted for several years."

"Moreover, the Clinton Foundation never was authorized by the IRS to engage in activities such as 'fighting HIV/AIDS,' providing disaster relief, and tackling 'climate change' internationally that are much more fruitful fundraising hooks than the Clinton complex in Little Rock."

Source: "WikiLeaks Dumps Mean Hillary’s Presidency Would Be Tainted from Day One" - National Review

If Clinton Foundation had provided official funding to RED or ONE for AIDs, -would that would have provided the perfect dispatch, as in a way to produce the missing AIDs funds? -As well as eliminating the issue of why they were taking the money in the first place when the Clinton Foundation and CGI had no such authorization from the IRS? -And the funds might be a very big plum indeed:

"The Clinton Foundation, Shady Accounting, and AIDs" - Byline Project